one-way anova with tukey honest significant difference Search Results


90
RStudio r studio version 0.98.1062
R Studio Version 0.98.1062, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/one-way+anova+with+tukey+honest+significant+difference/rstudio+version+0+98+1091/pm29763523-252-12-14
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
r studio version 0.98.1062 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriginLab corp originpro 2020
Originpro 2020, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/one-way+anova+with+tukey+honest+significant+difference/originpro+software/pmc10657792-63-14-16
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
originpro 2020 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Minitab Inc 17 software
17 Software, supplied by Minitab Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/one-way+anova+with+tukey+honest+significant+difference/17+minitab+software/pm38587709-104-11-10
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
17 software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Social Survey Research Information way anova
Way Anova, supplied by Social Survey Research Information, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/one-way+anova+with+tukey+honest+significant+difference/anova+two+way/10__1163_slash_15685411___bja10265-72-15-20
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
way anova - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriginLab corp software origin v.8.1
Software Origin V.8.1, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/one-way+anova+with+tukey+honest+significant+difference/software+origin+v+8+1/pmc11677459-110-4-17
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
software origin v.8.1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriginLab corp anova software
Anova Software, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/one-way+anova+with+tukey+honest+significant+difference/anova+software/pm29578009-133-10-22
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anova software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
RStudio version 1.4.1106
Version 1.4.1106, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/one-way+anova+with+tukey+honest+significant+difference/rstudio+version+1+3+1093/pmc09611027-94-10-12
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
version 1.4.1106 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
KyensLab Inc kyplot 6.0
Kyplot 6.0, supplied by KyensLab Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/one-way+anova+with+tukey+honest+significant+difference/kyplot+5+0/pm39893557-81-16-18
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
kyplot 6.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Gilead Sciences control paromomycin
Figure 2. AmB nanoparticles efficacy in the lesion cure model in BALB/c mice infected with luciferase-expressing L. major parasites. L. major infected mice were allocated into 8 groups: (G1) represents untreated infected group, (G2) <t>paromomycin</t> as a positive control (50 mg/kg/QD for 10 days; i.p.), (G3) AmBisome® as a comparison group (10 mg/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G4) CH-TPP nanoparticles (mass of nanoparticles in the blank formulations reflected the related AmB-loaded ones) (QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G5) AmB-CH-TPP nanoparticles (5 mg of AmB/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G6) CH-Dex nanoparticles (mass of nanoparticles in the blank formulations reflected the related AmB-loaded ones) (QAD for 10 days; iv), (G7) AmB-CH-Dex nanoparticles (10 mg of AmB/kg/one dose; i.v.), 24 h after the first (and only) dose of the formulation, the mice looked unwell with piloerection and weight loss, therefore data of G7 are not represented in the figure or (G8) the nanoparticles vehicle (distilled water, QAD for 10 days; i.v.). QAD: every other day, QD: once a day. The average lesion size and parasite load represent the mean ± SD. One way-ANOVA for parasite load (bioluminescence signal), parasite load (qPCR) and repeated measures for lesion size followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison tests was used to compare outcomes among the groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant ((*) p < 0.05, (**) p > 0.05 and (***) p < 0.05). (A) represents mean lesion size progression in function of time since the start of treatment, (B) represents the % reduction in lesion size compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10, (C) represents the bioluminescence signal in function of time since the start of treatment, (D) represents the bioluminescence signal compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10, (E) represents the parasite load (qPCR-DNA) at day 10 and (F) represents the % reduction in the parasite load (qPCR) compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10.
Control Paromomycin, supplied by Gilead Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/one-way+anova+with+tukey+honest+significant+difference/AmBisome/10__3390_slash_molecules25174002-73-11-34
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
control paromomycin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriginLab corp anova software origin v.8.1
Figure 2. AmB nanoparticles efficacy in the lesion cure model in BALB/c mice infected with luciferase-expressing L. major parasites. L. major infected mice were allocated into 8 groups: (G1) represents untreated infected group, (G2) <t>paromomycin</t> as a positive control (50 mg/kg/QD for 10 days; i.p.), (G3) AmBisome® as a comparison group (10 mg/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G4) CH-TPP nanoparticles (mass of nanoparticles in the blank formulations reflected the related AmB-loaded ones) (QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G5) AmB-CH-TPP nanoparticles (5 mg of AmB/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G6) CH-Dex nanoparticles (mass of nanoparticles in the blank formulations reflected the related AmB-loaded ones) (QAD for 10 days; iv), (G7) AmB-CH-Dex nanoparticles (10 mg of AmB/kg/one dose; i.v.), 24 h after the first (and only) dose of the formulation, the mice looked unwell with piloerection and weight loss, therefore data of G7 are not represented in the figure or (G8) the nanoparticles vehicle (distilled water, QAD for 10 days; i.v.). QAD: every other day, QD: once a day. The average lesion size and parasite load represent the mean ± SD. One way-ANOVA for parasite load (bioluminescence signal), parasite load (qPCR) and repeated measures for lesion size followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison tests was used to compare outcomes among the groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant ((*) p < 0.05, (**) p > 0.05 and (***) p < 0.05). (A) represents mean lesion size progression in function of time since the start of treatment, (B) represents the % reduction in lesion size compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10, (C) represents the bioluminescence signal in function of time since the start of treatment, (D) represents the bioluminescence signal compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10, (E) represents the parasite load (qPCR-DNA) at day 10 and (F) represents the % reduction in the parasite load (qPCR) compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10.
Anova Software Origin V.8.1, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/one-way+anova+with+tukey+honest+significant+difference/nonlinear+regression+analysis+with+origin+v+8+1/pm29578009-104-10-20
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anova software origin v.8.1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriginLab corp origin lab 2018
Figure 2. AmB nanoparticles efficacy in the lesion cure model in BALB/c mice infected with luciferase-expressing L. major parasites. L. major infected mice were allocated into 8 groups: (G1) represents untreated infected group, (G2) <t>paromomycin</t> as a positive control (50 mg/kg/QD for 10 days; i.p.), (G3) AmBisome® as a comparison group (10 mg/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G4) CH-TPP nanoparticles (mass of nanoparticles in the blank formulations reflected the related AmB-loaded ones) (QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G5) AmB-CH-TPP nanoparticles (5 mg of AmB/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G6) CH-Dex nanoparticles (mass of nanoparticles in the blank formulations reflected the related AmB-loaded ones) (QAD for 10 days; iv), (G7) AmB-CH-Dex nanoparticles (10 mg of AmB/kg/one dose; i.v.), 24 h after the first (and only) dose of the formulation, the mice looked unwell with piloerection and weight loss, therefore data of G7 are not represented in the figure or (G8) the nanoparticles vehicle (distilled water, QAD for 10 days; i.v.). QAD: every other day, QD: once a day. The average lesion size and parasite load represent the mean ± SD. One way-ANOVA for parasite load (bioluminescence signal), parasite load (qPCR) and repeated measures for lesion size followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison tests was used to compare outcomes among the groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant ((*) p < 0.05, (**) p > 0.05 and (***) p < 0.05). (A) represents mean lesion size progression in function of time since the start of treatment, (B) represents the % reduction in lesion size compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10, (C) represents the bioluminescence signal in function of time since the start of treatment, (D) represents the bioluminescence signal compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10, (E) represents the parasite load (qPCR-DNA) at day 10 and (F) represents the % reduction in the parasite load (qPCR) compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10.
Origin Lab 2018, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/one-way+anova+with+tukey+honest+significant+difference/origin+lab+2018/pm34205453-193-14-29
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
origin lab 2018 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
HULINKS Inc kaleidagraph software
Figure 2. AmB nanoparticles efficacy in the lesion cure model in BALB/c mice infected with luciferase-expressing L. major parasites. L. major infected mice were allocated into 8 groups: (G1) represents untreated infected group, (G2) <t>paromomycin</t> as a positive control (50 mg/kg/QD for 10 days; i.p.), (G3) AmBisome® as a comparison group (10 mg/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G4) CH-TPP nanoparticles (mass of nanoparticles in the blank formulations reflected the related AmB-loaded ones) (QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G5) AmB-CH-TPP nanoparticles (5 mg of AmB/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G6) CH-Dex nanoparticles (mass of nanoparticles in the blank formulations reflected the related AmB-loaded ones) (QAD for 10 days; iv), (G7) AmB-CH-Dex nanoparticles (10 mg of AmB/kg/one dose; i.v.), 24 h after the first (and only) dose of the formulation, the mice looked unwell with piloerection and weight loss, therefore data of G7 are not represented in the figure or (G8) the nanoparticles vehicle (distilled water, QAD for 10 days; i.v.). QAD: every other day, QD: once a day. The average lesion size and parasite load represent the mean ± SD. One way-ANOVA for parasite load (bioluminescence signal), parasite load (qPCR) and repeated measures for lesion size followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison tests was used to compare outcomes among the groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant ((*) p < 0.05, (**) p > 0.05 and (***) p < 0.05). (A) represents mean lesion size progression in function of time since the start of treatment, (B) represents the % reduction in lesion size compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10, (C) represents the bioluminescence signal in function of time since the start of treatment, (D) represents the bioluminescence signal compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10, (E) represents the parasite load (qPCR-DNA) at day 10 and (F) represents the % reduction in the parasite load (qPCR) compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10.
Kaleidagraph Software, supplied by HULINKS Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/one-way+anova+with+tukey+honest+significant+difference/kaleidagraph/pm40142019-373-12-16
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
kaleidagraph software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Figure 2. AmB nanoparticles efficacy in the lesion cure model in BALB/c mice infected with luciferase-expressing L. major parasites. L. major infected mice were allocated into 8 groups: (G1) represents untreated infected group, (G2) paromomycin as a positive control (50 mg/kg/QD for 10 days; i.p.), (G3) AmBisome® as a comparison group (10 mg/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G4) CH-TPP nanoparticles (mass of nanoparticles in the blank formulations reflected the related AmB-loaded ones) (QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G5) AmB-CH-TPP nanoparticles (5 mg of AmB/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G6) CH-Dex nanoparticles (mass of nanoparticles in the blank formulations reflected the related AmB-loaded ones) (QAD for 10 days; iv), (G7) AmB-CH-Dex nanoparticles (10 mg of AmB/kg/one dose; i.v.), 24 h after the first (and only) dose of the formulation, the mice looked unwell with piloerection and weight loss, therefore data of G7 are not represented in the figure or (G8) the nanoparticles vehicle (distilled water, QAD for 10 days; i.v.). QAD: every other day, QD: once a day. The average lesion size and parasite load represent the mean ± SD. One way-ANOVA for parasite load (bioluminescence signal), parasite load (qPCR) and repeated measures for lesion size followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison tests was used to compare outcomes among the groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant ((*) p < 0.05, (**) p > 0.05 and (***) p < 0.05). (A) represents mean lesion size progression in function of time since the start of treatment, (B) represents the % reduction in lesion size compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10, (C) represents the bioluminescence signal in function of time since the start of treatment, (D) represents the bioluminescence signal compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10, (E) represents the parasite load (qPCR-DNA) at day 10 and (F) represents the % reduction in the parasite load (qPCR) compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10.

Journal: Molecules

Article Title: Activity of Amphotericin B-Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles against Experimental Cutaneous Leishmaniasis

doi: 10.3390/molecules25174002

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. AmB nanoparticles efficacy in the lesion cure model in BALB/c mice infected with luciferase-expressing L. major parasites. L. major infected mice were allocated into 8 groups: (G1) represents untreated infected group, (G2) paromomycin as a positive control (50 mg/kg/QD for 10 days; i.p.), (G3) AmBisome® as a comparison group (10 mg/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G4) CH-TPP nanoparticles (mass of nanoparticles in the blank formulations reflected the related AmB-loaded ones) (QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G5) AmB-CH-TPP nanoparticles (5 mg of AmB/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G6) CH-Dex nanoparticles (mass of nanoparticles in the blank formulations reflected the related AmB-loaded ones) (QAD for 10 days; iv), (G7) AmB-CH-Dex nanoparticles (10 mg of AmB/kg/one dose; i.v.), 24 h after the first (and only) dose of the formulation, the mice looked unwell with piloerection and weight loss, therefore data of G7 are not represented in the figure or (G8) the nanoparticles vehicle (distilled water, QAD for 10 days; i.v.). QAD: every other day, QD: once a day. The average lesion size and parasite load represent the mean ± SD. One way-ANOVA for parasite load (bioluminescence signal), parasite load (qPCR) and repeated measures for lesion size followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison tests was used to compare outcomes among the groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant ((*) p < 0.05, (**) p > 0.05 and (***) p < 0.05). (A) represents mean lesion size progression in function of time since the start of treatment, (B) represents the % reduction in lesion size compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10, (C) represents the bioluminescence signal in function of time since the start of treatment, (D) represents the bioluminescence signal compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10, (E) represents the parasite load (qPCR-DNA) at day 10 and (F) represents the % reduction in the parasite load (qPCR) compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10.

Article Snippet: Such reductions were statistically similar to those caused by the positive control paromomycin (50 mg/kg/QD for 10 days; i.p., p > 0.05 by one-way-ANOVA-post Tukey) but significantly greater (around 2×) than those caused by AmBisome® (10 mg of AmB/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v., p < 0.05 by one-way-ANOVA-post Tukey) (Figure 2).

Techniques: Infection, Luciferase, Expressing, Positive Control, Comparison, Formulation

Figure 4. AmB nanoparticles efficacy in the lesion cure model in BALB/c mice infected with luciferase-expressing L. major parasites. L. major infected mice were allocated into 7 groups: (G1) represents untreated infected group, (G2) paromomycin as a positive control (50 mg/kg/QD for 10 days; i.p.), (G3) AmBisome® as a comparison group (10 mg/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G4) AmB-CH-TPP nanoparticles (5 mg of AmB/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G5) AmB-CH-TPP nanoparticles (2.5 mg of AmB/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G6) AmB-CH-TPP nanoparticles (1.25 mg of AmB/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.) and (G7) CH-TPP nanoparticles (nanoparticles mass being equivalent to that in animals receiving the 5 mg/kg dose) (QAD for 10 days; i.v.). The average lesion size and parasite load represent the mean ± SD. One-way-ANOVA for parasite load (bioluminescence signal), parasite load (qPCR) and repeated measures for lesion size followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison tests was used to compare outcomes among the groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant ((*) p < 0.05, (**) p > 0.05, (***) p < 0.05 and (****) p > 0.05). (A) represents mean lesion size progression in function of time since the start of treatment, (B) represents the % reduction in lesion size compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10, (C) represents the bioluminescence signal in function of time since the start of treatment, (D) represents the bioluminescence signal compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10, (E) represents the parasite load (qPCR-DNA) at day 10 and (F) represents the % reduction in the parasite load (qPCR) compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10.

Journal: Molecules

Article Title: Activity of Amphotericin B-Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles against Experimental Cutaneous Leishmaniasis

doi: 10.3390/molecules25174002

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. AmB nanoparticles efficacy in the lesion cure model in BALB/c mice infected with luciferase-expressing L. major parasites. L. major infected mice were allocated into 7 groups: (G1) represents untreated infected group, (G2) paromomycin as a positive control (50 mg/kg/QD for 10 days; i.p.), (G3) AmBisome® as a comparison group (10 mg/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G4) AmB-CH-TPP nanoparticles (5 mg of AmB/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G5) AmB-CH-TPP nanoparticles (2.5 mg of AmB/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.), (G6) AmB-CH-TPP nanoparticles (1.25 mg of AmB/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v.) and (G7) CH-TPP nanoparticles (nanoparticles mass being equivalent to that in animals receiving the 5 mg/kg dose) (QAD for 10 days; i.v.). The average lesion size and parasite load represent the mean ± SD. One-way-ANOVA for parasite load (bioluminescence signal), parasite load (qPCR) and repeated measures for lesion size followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison tests was used to compare outcomes among the groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant ((*) p < 0.05, (**) p > 0.05, (***) p < 0.05 and (****) p > 0.05). (A) represents mean lesion size progression in function of time since the start of treatment, (B) represents the % reduction in lesion size compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10, (C) represents the bioluminescence signal in function of time since the start of treatment, (D) represents the bioluminescence signal compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10, (E) represents the parasite load (qPCR-DNA) at day 10 and (F) represents the % reduction in the parasite load (qPCR) compared with G1 (untreated infected group) at day 10.

Article Snippet: Such reductions were statistically similar to those caused by the positive control paromomycin (50 mg/kg/QD for 10 days; i.p., p > 0.05 by one-way-ANOVA-post Tukey) but significantly greater (around 2×) than those caused by AmBisome® (10 mg of AmB/kg/QAD for 10 days; i.v., p < 0.05 by one-way-ANOVA-post Tukey) (Figure 2).

Techniques: Infection, Luciferase, Expressing, Positive Control, Comparison